For designers, a key consideration to improve the environmental performance of new
products and services is energy and resource efficiency (eco-efficiency). This is particularly
important for household energy using products (EuPs) as they consume significant energy
during the consumption (use) phase of their lifecycle.
EuPs incorporate many types of consumer electrical and electronic products, including
televisions and computers as well as the many other powered kitchen, laundry, bathroom
and personal electronic devices of which ownership, both individually and cumulatively has
increased dramatically in modern households. A consequence of EuP ownership and
changing behavioural patterns is that EuPs cumulative contribution to overall household
energy use is increasing in Australia, at 4.7% per annum. This is despite the sustained
efforts over many years to improve energy efficiency of individual EuPs that is claimed to
have improved at a rate of 2% per annum since 1970. This begs exploration of the drivers
underpinning this divergence between predicted energy conservation through efficiency
and actual energy use. The aim of this study is to investigate why household energy use
from EuPs continues to rise. Such situations are described as ‘rebound effects’ where
‘designed in’ energy savings are not achieved.
Exploring the proposition of the rebound effect, this study investigates design, ownership
and use parameters of televisions (and peripheral equipment), washing machines,
dishwashers and refrigerators benchmarked over a period of time. Drawing upon a variety
of technical and behavioural criteria, data is mapped and presented for analysis to locate,
identify and remark upon the qualities and significance of a likely rebound effect. Such
information, where identified, highlights the hidden implications and significance of
product use and user behaviour in shaping the success, or otherwise, of design strategies to
conserve energy and consumption.
DRS 2012 Bangkok
products and services is energy and resource efficiency (eco-efficiency). This is particularly
important for household energy using products (EuPs) as they consume significant energy
during the consumption (use) phase of their lifecycle.
EuPs incorporate many types of consumer electrical and electronic products, including
televisions and computers as well as the many other powered kitchen, laundry, bathroom
and personal electronic devices of which ownership, both individually and cumulatively has
increased dramatically in modern households. A consequence of EuP ownership and
changing behavioural patterns is that EuPs cumulative contribution to overall household
energy use is increasing in Australia, at 4.7% per annum. This is despite the sustained
efforts over many years to improve energy efficiency of individual EuPs that is claimed to
have improved at a rate of 2% per annum since 1970. This begs exploration of the drivers
underpinning this divergence between predicted energy conservation through efficiency
and actual energy use. The aim of this study is to investigate why household energy use
from EuPs continues to rise. Such situations are described as ‘rebound effects’ where
‘designed in’ energy savings are not achieved.
Exploring the proposition of the rebound effect, this study investigates design, ownership
and use parameters of televisions (and peripheral equipment), washing machines,
dishwashers and refrigerators benchmarked over a period of time. Drawing upon a variety
of technical and behavioural criteria, data is mapped and presented for analysis to locate,
identify and remark upon the qualities and significance of a likely rebound effect. Such
information, where identified, highlights the hidden implications and significance of
product use and user behaviour in shaping the success, or otherwise, of design strategies to
conserve energy and consumption.
DRS 2012 Bangkok
